Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 13:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imanshun (talkcontribs) 15:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Due to the nature of recent disruption, over the name of the state's (and the country's, and the continent's) highest mountain, I will leave a CTOPS notice per WP:CT/AP on the talk page, if there isn't one already there. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced/unconstructive additions from IPs. Taffer😊 💬(they/she) 15:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I tagged the talk page, added the edit notice, and protected this. This is a primary ARBPIA topic. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 81.92.241.66 is persistently removing sourced info and adding unsources info. 1Veertje (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: There are pages related to relationships and there are also real photos, which seems very inappropriate to me since there are minors who can see it.83.35.12.211 (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined not a valid reason for protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite full protection: Does not need to be edited. JustSomeoneNo (talk) 16:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined this is already template-protected; no need for anything more. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (Babysharkboss2) 19:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: An IP is persistently adding the unsourced, unofficial abbreviation "CM-BY2K" for a video game to the The Software Toolworks article. The page has already been protected once; since the protection expired on February 5, the IP has resumed its edits. Iiii I I I (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP editor appears to be using VPNs, popping up all over the world. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of political charged edits, risk of biased edits, controversial topic. Please just thoroughly review the page and then ensure not just anyone can edit the page. 2601:18E:C47C:5A90:F9DE:1D45:7A5F:2224 (talk) 19:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism (I know that “ts” is slang for “this shit” or mistakenly “this”, but it’s not relevant to the page) NameStuffs (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bunch of IPs adding or reintroducing non-notables or unsourced information and changing existing content in a non-productive manner. Requesting short PP to avoid continued whack-a-mole revisions. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 19:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... this page has been spammed for 5 years ago and protected in 2020 . 2001:44C8:4446:6855:B0EE:C038:4F25:5742 (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    I would like to request that... (it says British Colonialism in 1607 led to the 13 colonies when in fact it was the English Empire who colonised those 13 states, Britain was not a union until 1707) . Mrwardster (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    While you're technically correct, the term used in the article redirects to British colonization of the Americas; there, the point you wanted to make is actually made. I would decline this request. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    "prompting Israeli forces to fight back and apply the Hannibal Directive against its own citizens.[78][79][80] The clash resulted in the deaths of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 815 civilians.[81][82] After"

    CORRECTION:

    ". The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 815 civilians.[81][82] There were accusations that Israel applied the Hannibal Directive against its own soldiers.[78][79][80] After"

    Reason: Accuracy. The corrected form is what the provided sources support. The sources (and the directive) refer to soldiers, not civilians. Further, while sources for accusations are valid, the sources clearly frame this as a potential accusation rather than an establishment of fact, which the article's current phrasing misrepresents. Itamarro (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.